AdvancedClaudeChatGPTCopilot

SAR Narrative Drafter

What does this prompt do?

BSA officers and AML compliance analysts use this prompt to draft the narrative section of a Suspicious Activity Report β€” the most time-intensive and legally consequential part of the SAR filing. The AI accelerates first-draft production while enforcing FinCEN's required structural format, freeing the investigator to focus on factual accuracy and reviewer approval rather than writing mechanics.

Prompts

You are a BSA compliance officer with extensive experience drafting Suspicious Activity Reports. I will provide you with the details of a suspicious transaction pattern, and your task is to produce a FinCEN-compliant SAR narrative that is clear, complete, and ready for compliance reviewer approval.

Transaction and customer details:
- Subject: [SUBJECT NAME AND ROLE]
- Account type and number context: [ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION]
- Reporting period: [DATE RANGE]
- Total suspicious activity amount: [DOLLAR AMOUNT]
- Transaction types involved: [TRANSACTION TYPES]
- Suspicious activity description: [RAW ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION]
- Prior SARs filed on this subject: [PRIOR SAR HISTORY]

Draft the SAR narrative following FinCEN's who/what/when/where/why/how structure:

**WHO** β€” Identify all subjects of the suspicious activity. Include each individual or entity's role in the activity, their relationship to the reporting institution, and any known identifying information without including PII that is already captured in the SAR form fields.

**WHAT** β€” Describe the suspicious activity in specific, factual terms. Name the transaction types, instruments used, and the total dollar amounts for each. Avoid conclusory statements such as 'money laundering occurred' β€” describe the behavior, not the conclusion.

**WHEN** β€” State the specific date range of the suspicious activity and note any significant dates, escalations in volume, or changes in pattern within the reporting period.

**WHERE** β€” Identify the locations involved: branch, ATM, wire transfer corridors, geographic jurisdictions of counterparties, and any high-risk country involvement.

**WHY** β€” Explain why the activity is suspicious. Reference the deviations from the customer's expected activity profile, the applicable AML typology, and why legitimate explanations were insufficient or unavailable.

**HOW** β€” Describe the method used to conduct the suspicious activity: the account structure, transaction sequencing, use of multiple accounts or entities, and any structuring pattern evident.

**Continuing Activity Notation**
If the suspicious activity is ongoing, include the standard FinCEN continuing activity statement.

Write in clear, factual, third-person prose. Use past tense. Avoid jargon, abbreviations without definition, and speculative language. Target length: 250 to 400 words. End with a statement of the institution's response and any account action taken.

Prompt Variables

Replace each placeholder with your specific information:

[SUBJECT NAME AND ROLE]
[ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION]
[DATE RANGE]
[DOLLAR AMOUNT]
[TRANSACTION TYPES]
[RAW ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION]
[PRIOR SAR HISTORY]

What You'll Get

A complete SAR narrative structured around the six FinCEN reporting elements (who, what, when, where, why, how), written in factual third-person past tense, within 250 to 400 words, concluding with the institution's response and any account action taken. Speculative language and conclusory statements are excluded.

πŸ’‘ Pro Tip

Never input real customer PII into a commercial AI tool. Before using this prompt, replace all names, account numbers, SSNs, and identifying details with placeholders β€” then substitute the real data back into the output using your internal drafting system. Treat the AI output as a structural template, not a final document.

Compatible AI Tools

Claude

Strongest choice for SAR narrative drafting. Claude produces structured, reviewer-ready prose that adheres to FinCEN's who/what/when/where/why/how format without introducing speculative language. Use the extended thinking mode for complex multi-subject cases to ensure logical consistency across the narrative sections.

ChatGPT

Reliable for SAR narratives when given detailed input. Use GPT-4o for best results. Always instruct it explicitly to avoid conclusory money laundering labels β€” describe behavior, not conclusions. Review the output carefully for any phrasing that implies guilt rather than suspicious behavior.

Copilot

Effective for financial institutions using Microsoft Purview Compliance or Azure-hosted BSA/AML platforms. Copilot can draft the narrative directly into your SAR filing template within Word or a SharePoint compliance workflow, reducing copy-paste errors before submission.

Related Prompts

AML Red Flag Identifier

AML compliance analysts and transaction monitoring teams use this prompt to investigate flagged accounts or suspicious activity alerts β€” accelerating the triage of complex cases by systematically identifying typology patterns, connecting behavioral indicators, and producing a documented disposition recommendation that supports the SAR decision or case closure.

KYC Document Checklist Generator

Compliance officers and onboarding teams use this prompt to rapidly generate a complete, jurisdiction-specific KYC document checklist when opening new accounts for individuals, SMBs, or corporations β€” reducing the risk of missing required documentation and ensuring regulatory alignment before the first transaction.

Fraud Risk Assessment

Internal auditors, risk managers, and finance controllers use this prompt to conduct structured fraud risk assessments for individual business processes β€” replacing the inconsistent, experience-dependent approach of manual fraud brainstorming sessions with a systematic scheme identification and control mapping methodology aligned to COSO that can be applied uniformly across the enterprise.

Related Resources

glossarySAR Glossary
glossaryAML Glossary
glossaryBSA Glossary
← Back to AI Prompts